This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Securities

Apr. 2, 2003

'America West' Rejects Strict Standard On Stock Price Effect

Focus Column - Securities Law - By M. Chapman Findlay, David R. Garcia and G. Michael Phillips - Some 15 years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court considered the question of whether the element of reliance in fraud claims under Section 10b of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 would, in effect, require each member of a potential claimant class to offer proof of individualized reliance. See Basic Inc. v. Levinson , 485 U.S. 224 (1988).

        Focus Column
        
        Securities Law
        
        By M. Chapman Findlay, David R. Garcia and G. Michael Phillips
        
     ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)