For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.
To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright.
It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes
and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission.
Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial
marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
THE ADVISER A design can't be protected as trade dress unless it has achieved secondary meaning. By Rod S. Berman and Steve Plotkin
By Rod S. Berman and Steve Plotkin
On March 22, in Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Samara Brothers Inc., 120 S.Ct. 1339 (2000), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a product's appearance or design cannot be protected as trade dress under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. Section 1125(a)) unless the appearance of the product has achieved so-called "secondary meaning"; that i...
Or access this article for $45 (Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
How can we help you?
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policyhere.