This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Dec. 13, 2012

Workers face uphill battle in circumventing arbitration agreements

With the U.S. Supreme Court's 2012 decision in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, employers are playing with a strengthened hand when compelling arbitration.


By Laura Hautala


Daily Journal Staff Writer


In a lawsuit against her former employer, Nicki Capachi has not yet had a chance to test her disability discrimination claims in court. That's because uncertainty over arbitration agreements, and whether they can ever be dismissed as unfair, has taken her case to the 3rd District Court of Appeal. She's in good company. Plaintiffs' lawyers say many employment suits are facing motions to compel arbit...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up