This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

Dec. 11, 2012

Malpractice claims linger after class action settlement

Many attorneys assume that court approval of a settlement automatically insulates them from any future malpractice claims, but the law does not actually provide such wide sweeping protection. By Alyson Decker


By Alyson Decker


Although most attorneys who handle class action cases assume that court approval of a settlement automatically insulates them from any future malpractice claims, the leading California case law does not actually provide such wide sweeping protection. See Martorana v. Marlin & Saltzman, 175 Cal. App. 4th 685 (2009); Janik v. Rudy, Exelrod & Zieff, 119 Cal. App. 4th 930 (2004). Likewise, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals h...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up