Letter to the Editor
Dec. 6, 2012
Revisiting the NLRB's 24 Hour Fitness ruling
I read with interest Eli Kantor's article, "NLRB's 24 Hour Fitness Ruling Consistent With Precedent," Nov. 28.
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN
I read with interest Eli Kantor's article, "NLRB's 24 Hour Fitness Ruling Consistent With Precedent," Nov. 28. The article seems to imply that mandatory arbitration policies for individual claims are valid so long as "employees are given the opportunity to opt out," but the ALJ's ruling in 24 Hour Fitness did not reach that issue and that is clearly not the law as it stands today. Agreements to arbitrate individual claims a...For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In