This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Ethics/Professional Responsibility

Nov. 23, 2012

Appeals court reverses half-million dollar malpractice judgment against Burlingame lawyer

A veteran Burlingame land use lawyer won a long struggle with disgruntled clients as a state appellate panel reversed a half-million dollar malpractice judgment against him.


By John Roemer


Daily Journal Staff Writer


A veteran Burlingame land use lawyer won a long struggle with disgruntled clients as a state appellate panel reversed a half-million dollar malpractice judgment against him.


The lawyer, Herman H. Fitzgerald, who has practiced eminent domain law for 50 years, is entitled to $242,000 for the work he did before the clients fired him plus his costs in appealing the malpractice judgment, the 1st District Co...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up