Letter to the Editor
Oct. 3, 2015
LETTER: AB 465 an overdue fix to 'pay to play' justice
Kim Stone's recent column, "In defense of requiring employees to arbitrate claims" (Sept. 30) warrants a response. Studies show employees are at a disadvantage when required to resolve disputes by arbitration. By Jeff Rager
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN
Kim Stone's recent column, "In defense of requiring employees to arbitrate claims" (Sept. 30), warrants a response. In March 2011, the Journal of Empirical Legal Studies published the largest study to date examining employment outcomes in American Arbitration Association cases. Using data from reports filed by AAA pursuant to California Code requirements, the study analyzed 3,945 arbitration ca...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In