This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Oct. 2, 2015

Can the court just remove a measure?

On Oct. 6, the most significant separation of powers case the state Supreme Court has faced in decades is scheduled for hearing. By Michael B. Salerno


By Michael B. Salerno


On Oct. 6, Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association v. Padilla, S220289, the most significant separation of powers case the state Supreme Court has
faced in decades, is scheduled for hearing. The case concerns Proposition 49 - an
advisory measure on whether Congress shall propose, and the state Legislature ratify,
an amendment to the U.S. Constitution overturning Citizens United v. FEC

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up