This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judges and Judiciary

Jul. 21, 2012

Audits reveal discrepancies in judicial campaigns

Random audits of several 2010 California judicial candidates - some now on the bench - reveal noncompliance with campaign finance reporting rules by numerous campaigns for different reasons.


By Paul Jones


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Random audits of several 2010 California judicial candidates - some now on the bench - reveal noncompliance with campaign finance reporting rules by numerous campaigns for different reasons.


But most of the issues are relatively minor, and the fact that so many campaigns ran afoul of the rules may bolster concerns that the regulations are challenging to comply with and support a controversial effort to ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up