This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

May 19, 2016

Uber objections escalate in frequency and severity

Multiple plaintiffs' attorneys have opposed the up to $100 million settlement Uber Technologies Inc.reached with California and Massachusetts drivers.

By Matthew Blake
Daily Journal Staff Writer

Is there a plaintiffs' attorney who has not vitriolically opposed the up to $100 million settlement Uber Technologies Inc.reached with California and Massachusetts drivers?

No less than the 32nd motion was filed late Monday balking at the deal Boston-based plaintiffs' attorney Shannon Liss-Riordan hammered out with Uber lead counsel Theodore J. Boutrous in the seminal worker misclassification ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up