Labor/Employment
May 5, 2016
Justices struggle to find clarity in arbitration dispute
In an oral argument for a workplace dispute at a Toyota dealership, state Supreme Court justices struggled Tuesday to get lawyers to explain whether an arbitrator or judge should decide who hears a putative class action.
Daily Journal Staff Writer
In an oral argument regarding a workplace dispute at a Manhattan Beach Toyota dealership, state Supreme Court justices struggled on Tuesday to get lawyers to explain why they were right about the question at hand: Whether an arbitrator or judge decides if a putative class action may be heard before an arbitrator when the contract is unclear. Sandquist v. Lebo Automotive Inc., S220812.
Chief Ju...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In