This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Sep. 8, 2011

Making a case in pharmaceutical and medical device product liability

When making a medical product liability claim, pay attention to the type of product at issue and the U.S. Supreme Court precedent that matches it. By Lisa M. Baird and Michael K. Brown of Reed Smith LLP


By Lisa M. Baird and Michael K. Brown


Over the past three years, the U.S. Supreme Court has issued a spate of rulings regarding the doctrine of federal pre-emption that have dramatically changed which medical product manufacturers can be held liable in tort, and for what. These decisions have been technical and seemingly inconsistent in their results, and those looking for a cohesive, disciplined or consistent doctrinal approach to pre-emption jurisprudence will ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up