This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Aug. 5, 2003

'Safe Harbor' Shields Actions Taken Under Laws Later Declared Invalid

Focus Column - Litigation - By David Martinez - The so-called "safe harbor" defense to claims brought under the state's unfair-competition law provides that a defendant may not be held liable under the "unfair" prong of the law for conduct that the Legislature expressly authorized or approved. See Cel-Tech Communications Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Tele. Co. , 20 Cal.4th 163 (1999).

        Focus Column
        
        Litigation
        
        By David...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)