This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Aug. 1, 2003

Courts Struggle With Class Arbitration Questions

Paralleling congressional attempts to limit class actions legislatively, federal and state courts continue to struggle judicially with the right to compel arbitration of consolidated claims.

Lawrence Waddington

Neutral, JAMS

Email: waddington1@aol.com

Lawrence is a retired Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge and former assistant attorney general for the state of California. He is author of "Disorder in the Court" at Amazon.com. He also edits the 9th Circuit blog, "The 9th Circuit Watch."

Paralleling congressional attempts to limit class actions legislatively, federal and state courts continue to struggle judicially with the right to compel arbitration of consolidated claims.

Practitioners expected to receive guidance from the U.S. Supreme Court on whether state courts can order class-action arbitration in Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Bazzle, 2003 DJDAR 6779 (U.S. June 23, 2003). Instead, the justices merely decided that the language of the arbitration claus...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)