This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Nov. 30, 2016

Prison construction, 'lock-'em-up' mentality is no longer the case

Rather than just opposing Propositions 57, 36 and 47, why aren't California's district attorneys or law enforcement leaders demanding more rehabilitation services at our prisons? By Eugene M. Hyman

Rather than just opposing Propositions 57, 36 and 47, why aren't California's district attorneys or law enforcement leaders demanding more rehabilitation services at our prisons? ["Prop. 57 puts safety at risk," Nov. 17].

Presently, 60 percent or more of paroled prisoners return to prison because of a parole violation, often connected to alcohol or drug use and related crime. Yet not all prisons have substance abuse programs, including something ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up