This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Criminal

Nov. 2, 2016

Defendant's First Amendment challenge heads to appellate panel

The 1st District Court of Appeal will consider Wednesday whether a state law that prohibits individuals from knowingly telling lies to law enforcement violates the First Amendment.

By Kevin Lee
Daily Journal Staff Writer

The 1st District Court of Appeal will consider Wednesday whether a state law that prohibits individuals from knowingly telling lies to law enforcement violates the First Amendment.

The defendant in the case, Wilson Morera-Munoz, argues that Section 31 of the California Vehicle Code is an unconstitutional "content-based regulation."

The state law, first enacted in 1965...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up