This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Nov. 2, 2011

Court of Appeal upholds drug patent settlement

California's 4th District Court of Appeal ruled Monday that patent settlement agreements related to the antibiotic Cipro do not violate antitrust laws.

By Mandy Jackson
Daily Journal Staff Writer

California's 4th District Court of Appeal followed the federal courts on Monday in ruling that patent settlement agreements related to the antibiotic Cipro do not violate antitrust laws.

Nine class action lawsuits filed by private citizens were coordinated in California. The plaintiffs said settlements between Cipro-maker Bayer Corp. and generic drugmakers Barr Laboratories Inc. and Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. violated anti...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up