This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court

Oct. 6, 2011

High Court considers defendant's right to counsel

In a case closely watched by criminal appellate attorneys, the U.S. Supreme Court weighed Tuesday whether a defendant's right to counsel should extend to state habeas proceedings.


By Robert Iafolla


Daily Journal Staff Writer


WASHINGTON - In a case closely watched by criminal appellate attorneys, the U.S. Supreme Court weighed Tuesday whether a defendant's right to counsel should extend to state habeas proceedings.


The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that an Arizona prisoner was not entitled to an appellate lawyer in post-conviction review to argue that his trial counsel was deficient. Martinez v. Ryan...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up