Daily Journal Staff Writer
WASHINGTON - In a case closely watched by criminal appellate attorneys, the U.S. Supreme Court weighed Tuesday whether a defendant's right to counsel should extend to state habeas proceedings.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that an Arizona prisoner was not entitled to an appellate lawyer in post-conviction review to argue that his trial counsel was deficient. Martinez v. Ryan...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In