This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Courts of Appeal

Oct. 4, 2011

Panel says judge went too far in molestation case

Sex, lies and videotape combined in an explosive mix Friday as a state appellate panel held a judge went too far in dismissing child molestation charges because a prosecutor failed to disclose a key video and gave false testimony in court.


By John Roemer


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Sex, lies and videotape combined in an explosive mix Friday as a state appellate panel held that a Santa Clara County judge went too far in dismissing child molestation charges because a prosecutor failed to disclose a key video and gave false testimony in court.


The opinion shed light on a practice that has denied thousands of Santa Clara County sex crimes defendants exculpatory material for decades. ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up