Intellectual Property
Jan. 25, 2000
Making Change
By Rod S. Berman and Steven Plotkin One of the more perplexing recent pronouncements by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the decision in CDN Inc. v. Kapes , 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12157 (Dec. 9, 1999) (petitioned for rehearing in banc filed), supports the proposition that creatively developed numbers receive protection under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. Section 103. How can this be?
By Rod S. Berman and Steven Plotkin
One of the more perplexing recent pronouncements by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the decision in CDN Inc. v. Kapes, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12157 (Dec. 9, 1999) (petitioned for rehearing in banc filed), supports the proposition that creatively developed numbers receive pro...
One of the more perplexing recent pronouncements by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the decision in CDN Inc. v. Kapes, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12157 (Dec. 9, 1999) (petitioned for rehearing in banc filed), supports the proposition that creatively developed numbers receive pro...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In