This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Supreme Court

Jun. 14, 2016

State high court to weigh if drugmaker is liable for generic drug's harm

The state Supreme Court will review whether the makers of brand-name pharmaceuticals can be sued for failing to warn of a drug's defects when a generic version of a brand-name drug allegedly caused injury.

By Kevin Lee
Daily Journal Staff Writer

The state Supreme Court will review whether the makers of brand-name pharmaceuticals can be sued for failing to warn of a drug's defects when it was a generic version of a brand-name drug that allegedly caused injury.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. has asked the high court to be absolved of liability from harm allegedly sustained by twin minors in utero when their mother consumed generic versions ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up