This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Oct. 16, 2007

Cruel and Unusual Rulings

Forum Column - By Michael Willemsen - California courts that have tried to skirt the question of whether registration for sex offenders violates the Eighth Amendment have concocted a rationale that gives government sweeping powers to "protect the public."

FORUM COLUMN

By Michael Willemsen

      Proposition 83, an initiative measure enacted in 2006, substantially altered California's sex offender registration laws. Some of Proposition 83's provisions were clearly penal in character: The proposition changed the definition of certain sexual offenses, and increased the term of imprisonment or the period of parole for some offenses.
      Constitutional co...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up