EMPLOYMENT COLUMN
By Alisa M. Chevalier
and Mani Sheik
Allowing flexibility in how employers go about reimbursing employees for the costs they incur while doing their jobs sounded like a pretty reasonable idea to the California Supreme Court.
During the Sept. 6 oral arguments in Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers Inc., the court seemed inclined to permit employers options for how ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In