This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Oct. 12, 2007

California's Misguided Crusade Against Deadbeat Dads Casts Too Broad a Net

Forum Column - By Jeffrey A. Lowe - The Golden State's courts have come to a surprising conclusion: You need not be a child's biological father to be responsible for child support.

FORUM COLUMN

By Jeffrey A. Lowe

      Child support statutes are a legal world unto themselves," In re Marriage of Hall ( 2001), 81 Cal. App. 4th. 313. This statement is a reflection of the state of the law in California, where the state knowingly enforces child support obligations on men who are proven not to be the biological father.
      When it can be proven that the state has wrongfully ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up