This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Administrative/Regulatory

Jun. 2, 2015

Bill will not provide relief for businesses recording calls

It is clear that California's Invasion of Privacy Act needs reform. Unfortunately for most businesses, AB 925 will not provide the relief they seek. By Edward D. Totino and Monica D. Scott

Edward D. Totino

Partner
Baker McKenzie

Cornell University; Ithaca NY

See more...

Monica D. Scott

See more...

By Edward D. Totino and Monica D. Scott

Last month, the California Assembly Committee on Public Safety approved Assembly Bill 925, an act introduced by newly elected Rep. Evan Low to amend California Penal Code Section 632.7, which is part of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA). While AB 925 seeks to assist businesses who record calls for quality assurance purposes and curb lawsuits, the actual proposed changes ma...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up