Product Liability
Sep. 4, 1999
Suspicious Minds
^^Tort Law^^ Suspicious Minds Court Catalogues Personal-Injury Statute of Limitations The Supreme Court backed away from resolving any conflict between 'Bristol-Myers' and the appellate 'Norgart' holding because, in its opinion, there was no such conflict.
By Michael K. Brown and Nicole M. Mills
For more than 10 years, the statute of limitations for a personal-injury claim in California began to run when the plaintiff suspected or should have suspected that his or her injury was caused by someone's wrongdoing. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co., 44 Cal.3d 1103 (1988). Althoug...
For more than 10 years, the statute of limitations for a personal-injury claim in California began to run when the plaintiff suspected or should have suspected that his or her injury was caused by someone's wrongdoing. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co., 44 Cal.3d 1103 (1988). Althoug...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In