Litigation
May 20, 2003
Party Must Attack Punitives Proof at Trial or Waives Right to Do It Later
Focus Column - Litigation - By David Martinez - Defense practitioners navigating California's state courts are familiar with the state Supreme Court's holding in Adams v. Murakami , 54 Cal.3d 10 (1991), which gives defendants a nonwaivable right to post-verdict judicial review of a punitive-damages award. In a recent decision with constitutional implications, however, a divided 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel undercut the Adam rule's viability in federal court by holding that it must yield




Focus Column
Litigation
By David Martinez
 ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In