LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN
By Michael Nava I read with understandable interest Justice J. Anthony Kline's article characterizing my decision to challenge Richard Ulmer for a seat on the San Francisco Superior Court as an attack on judicial independence. I must disagree. Justice Kline "acknowledge[s] the constitutional right to challenge a sitting judge," but argues "the challenge must be justified by the incumbent's unfitness or some oth...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In