This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court

Jan. 24, 2014

9th Circuit mass action view remains intact

The justices' unanimous ruling on a mass action circuit split reinforces the 9th Circuit's rule. By John A. Vogt and Ann T. Rossum


By John A. Vogt and Ann T. Rossum


With a unanimous ruling in Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. Optronics Corp. et al., 2014 DJDAR 438 (Jan. 14), the U.S. Supreme Court resolved a circuit split and concluded that the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) does not provide federal jurisdiction for a parens patriae suit as a mass action. This decision reinforces the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' present view, articulated in Nevada v. Bank of America, 672...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up