This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Apr. 25, 2002

Use of Overbreadth in 'Ashcroft' Case Jeopardizes Children's Welfare

Forum Column - By Robert Peters - When a draft of the proposed "virtual" child porn law at issue in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition was being circulated and discussed, I recall thinking how difficult it is to write a law broad enough to address the entire problem without reaching "expression" that either does not cause the harm at which the law is aimed or nevertheless should be protected for some other reason.

        Forum Column
        
        By Robert Peters

        
        When a draft of the proposed "virtual" child porn law at issue in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition was being circulated ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up