This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit

Apr. 18, 2017

Pretrial consolidation requests don't trigger CAFA, 9th Circuit rules

Though plaintiffs requested a bellwether trial, the request wasn't a binding consolidation request.

By Steven Crighton
Daily Journal Staff Writer

A 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel declined to remove eight similarly filed product liability suits to federal court Friday, clarifying the scope of a rule that parties to a class action might use to seek more preferable venues.

Defendant-appellant Cordis Corp. argued that the claims it faced for allegedly producing defective medical devices should be consolidated and removed to feder...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up