This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

Nov. 29, 2003

Bonus Plans May Have Unintended Consequences

Employment Column - By J. Kevin Lilly - California employment law is filled with examples of the law of unintended consequences. One recent example of this principle is how the state's courts have applied wage and hour law to bonus plans. Such plans have been a popular means of sharing profit and attracting and retaining quality employees. However, recently courts have applied statutes designed to protect employee wages in a way that may make it difficult or even impossible to maintain bonus plans, at least for nonexempt employees.

        
        Employment Column
        
        By J. Kevin Lilly
        
        California employment law is filled with examples of the law of unintended consequences.
 ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up