I read Justice J. Anthony Kline's endorsement of Judge Michael Ulmer and thought he made some pretty good points regarding the basis for challenging a sitting judge. ("Judicial Election Presents Political Dangers," July 12) His argument seems to be that if the judge is not unfit or a rogue of some sort, that having a perfectly competent judge tossed off the bench and replaced by someone new is not always in the best interest of the judiciary or the...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In