Intellectual Property
Jan. 21, 2016
Patent challenge standard: PTAB versus district court
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in the latest patent case involving PTAB's patent claim construction standard. By Ben Davidson
Ben M. Davidson
Founder
Davidson Law Group ALC
Intellectual Property
Phone: (310) 473-2300
Email: Ben@dlgla.com
George Washington Univ Law School
Ben is a former patent examiner and represents corporations in intellectual property litigation and proceedings before the U. S. Patent & Trademark Office.
Should the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) interpret patents using the same rules that district courts use in patent infringement litigation? On Jan. 15, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari to answer that question in Cuozzo Speed Tech v. Lee, 15-446.
Inter partes reviews, or "IPRs," are a powerful tool for challenging patents under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) passed by Congress ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In