On March 14, the Court of Appeal published its decision in Behr v. Redmond. One interesting aspect of that opinion concerns the plaintiff's claim for future medical expense damages. Although the bulk of the plaintiff's recovery was ultimately reversed on appeal on substantial evidence grounds, the assertion of a new defense that was unavailable at the time of the Behr trial - under the federal Patient Protection and Accou...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In