This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit

Apr. 22, 2016

Redacted timesheets must be shared with opposing counsel, 9th Circuit rules

The appellate court ruled Wednesday a district judge should have shared redacted timesheets with defense counsel before ordering them to pay $2.3 million in attorneys' fees in a class action case.

By Fiona Smith
Daily Journal Staff Writer

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals stepped into an attorney fees dispute Wednesday, ruling that a district judge should have shared redacted timesheets with defense counsel before ordering them to pay $2.3 million in attorneys' fees in a class action case.

U.S. District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald of Los Angeles violated the defense's due process rights by reviewing the timesheets in chamber...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up