By Daniel J. Curtin Jr.
Last month, the California Court of Appeal held that the city of San Juan Capistrano could not adopt, on an urgency basis, an interim ordinance that prohibited processing development applications, such as tentative subdivision maps, even though it could clearly prohibit development. Building Ind...
Last month, the California Court of Appeal held that the city of San Juan Capistrano could not adopt, on an urgency basis, an interim ordinance that prohibited processing development applications, such as tentative subdivision maps, even though it could clearly prohibit development. Building Ind...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




