This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Corporate

Feb. 10, 2001

No Bright Line

The Court of Appeal in Kawasaki struggles to determine which standard for review to use.

        By Mitchell S. Shapiro
        
        When a motor-vehicle dealer is terminated by a manufacturer, it is entitled to protest the termination and receive a hearing before the California New Motor Vehicle Board. See Vehicle Code Section 3060 et seq. The board's decision may be reviewed by the Superior Court.
   ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up