This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Sep. 6, 2007

Vexing Venues

Focus Column - By Peter J. Engstrom and Nancy Chung Allred - A new ruling from the California Court of Appeal signals a shift in when motions for an inconvenient forum may be brought.

FOCUS COLUMN

By Peter J. Engstrom and Nancy Chung Allred

      Just how long can a defendant wait before moving to stay or dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens? In Britton v. Dallas Airmotive Inc., 2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1143 (Jul. 11, 2007), the California Court of Appeal reconciled two arguably inconsistent sections of the Code of Civil Procedure, confirming that forum non conveniens motions may be brought even aft...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up