Civil Litigation,
Law Practice
Mar. 5, 2016
Courts consider changes to FRCP
Five recent cases bear careful attention when considering applicability of the new amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
A. Marco Turk
Emeritus Professor
CSU Dominguez Hills
Email: amarcoturk.commentary@gmail.com
A. Marco Turk is a contributing writer, professor emeritus and former director of the Negotiation, Conflict Resolution and Peacebuilding program at CSU Dominguez Hills, and currently adjunct professor of law, Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution, Pepperdine University Caruso School of Law.
According to Kroll Ontrack, the reputed technical recovery world leader offering convenient and cost-effective technical solutions for retrieval of lost data, five recent cases bear careful attention when considering applicability of the new amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Nuvasive v. Madsen Med. (S.D. Cal.); Stinson v. City of New York (S.D.N.Y.); Henry v. Morgan's Hotel Group (S.D.N.Y.); ChriMar Systems v. Cisco Systems (N.D. Cal.); and H...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In