California Courts of Appeal
Aug. 30, 2016
4th District won't disqualify its justices from hearing suit against JAMS
The 4th District Court of Appeal will not disqualify all its justices from hearing a lawsuit against JAMS and its co-founder, retired Justice John K. Trotter, rejecting allegations of inherent bias because of the ADR provider's status as a lucrative post-bench option.
Daily Journal Staff Writer
The 4th District Court of Appeal will not disqualify all its justices from hearing a lawsuit against JAMS and its co-founder, retired Justice John K. Trotter, rejecting allegations of inherent bias because of the ADR provider's status as a lucrative post-bench option.
"Individual justices will determine whether they will recuse themselves," according to an order issu...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In