This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Supreme Court

Aug. 22, 2015

Court: Attorneys are not protected by one-year time limit if misconduct is actually theft

Theft of client funds is different from malpractice, the state Supreme Court held on Thursday, so lawyers can't rely on a one-year time limit for filing lawsuits against them if their alleged misconduct goes beyond professional duty.


By John Roemer


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Theft of client funds is different from malpractice, the state Supreme Court held
on Thursday, so lawyers can't rely on a one-year time limit for filing lawsuits against
them if their alleged misconduct goes beyond professional duty.


The ruling left alive client Nancy F. Lee's claims that Newport Beach attorney William

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up