Civil Litigation
Dec. 10, 2013
Erratic rulings in Google Wiretap Act cases
In just over a two-month span, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has issued two diametrically opposed orders related to the federal Wiretap Act.
Ara R. Jabagchourian
Law Offices of Ara Jabagchourian PC
1650 S Amphlett Blvd
San Mateo , CA 94402
Phone: (650) 437-6840
Fax: (650) 403-0909
Email: ara@arajlaw.com
In just over a two-month span, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has issued two diametrically opposed orders related to the federal Wiretap Act. On Sept. 26, District Court Judge Lucy H. Koh issued an order which held that the Wiretap Act's "ordinary course of business exception is narrow." In re Google Inc. Gmail Litigation, Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, p.13 (emphasis added). Then Dec. 3, Magistrate...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In