This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Apr. 11, 2017

Gorsuch nomination did not violate the 'advice and consent' requirement

"Is Trump's nomination of Neil Gorsuch unconstitutional?" Craig Horowitz posed the question in a recent column. By Larry DeSha

"Is Trump's nomination of Neil Gorsuch unconstitutional?" Craig Horowitz posed the question in his Feb. 6 column. In summary, he said, the Gorsuch nomination "violates the U.S. Constitution and ignores the separation of powers that has served our nation well." After Garland was nominated, Horowitz said, the next steps were Senate hearings and a vote, but the Senate simply disregarded the mandate of the Constitution's text and refused to fulfill its con...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up