By Laura Ernde
Daily Journal Staff Writer
The California Supreme Court on Thursday shielded the deep pockets of big law firms from stale malpractice claims.
In the first opinion of its new term, a unanimous court said law firms cannot be held liable for the wrongdoing of attorneys who left their ranks. Beal Bank v. Arter & Hadden, 2007 DJDAR 15089 (Cal. Sept. 27, 2007).<...
Daily Journal Staff Writer
The California Supreme Court on Thursday shielded the deep pockets of big law firms from stale malpractice claims.
In the first opinion of its new term, a unanimous court said law firms cannot be held liable for the wrongdoing of attorneys who left their ranks. Beal Bank v. Arter & Hadden, 2007 DJDAR 15089 (Cal. Sept. 27, 2007).<...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In