This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Sep. 29, 2007

Fleecing Voters: Election Reform Initiative Isn't Just Unfair; It's Unconstitutional

Forum Column - By Michael Willemsen - A ballot initiative that would award California's electoral votes proportionately has one fatal flaw: The Founding Fathers never intended the public at large to be able to make such a decision.

FORUM COLUMN

By Michael Willemsen

      A proposed initiative that would change the way California casts its electoral votes in a presidential election, moving the state from a winner-take-all system to one proportioned by congressional districts, is unconstitutional and should be excluded from the ballot.
      California has 55 electoral votes, one for each of the 53 representatives in Congress and...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up