This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Supreme Court

Feb. 7, 2013

State Supreme Court debates trial court judges' ability to offer indicated sentences

Trial court judges across the state can take comfort in the fact that the state Supreme Court still seems prepared to endorse "indicated sentences," but justices seemed inclined to limit that ability during oral arguments Tuesday.

By Emily Green

Daily Journal Staff Writer

See Correction Below.

SAN FRANCISCO - Trial court judges across the state can take comfort in the fact that the state Supreme Court still appears prepared to endorse the concept of "indicated sentences."

But during oral arguments Tuesday, Supreme Court justices suggested that if trial judges give an indicated sentence, they should be prepared to sentence the defendant to the same number of years eve...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up