This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Perspective

Jan. 29, 2013

It's not as if Ralphs is leaving California

Gideon Kanner's argument that union grocery clerks are "strangers" with no right to "intrude" on Ralphs Supermarkets' property rights is unpersuasive. By Ruth D. Shapin

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN

Gideon Kanner's argument that union grocery clerks are "strangers" with no right to "intrude" on Ralphs Supermarkets' property rights is unpersuasive. ["Does the Freedom of Expression Trump Property Rights?," Jan. 22]. In fact, the grocery clerks and their union are part of Ralphs' family with as much right to be there as the strangers who shop there. The decision in Ralphs was correct. Under the First Amendment, as well...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up