Daily Journal Staff Writer
Sometimes a lawyer needs a little nudge in the right direction.
Twice, plaintiffs' attorney R. Duane Westrup pled his client's case under what's known as the continuing violation doctrine. His client alleged Canon Business Solutions Inc. overcharged him for years.
A trial judge and a divided appellate panel rejected that argument as time-barred. But the attorney caught a lucky bre...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In