LOS ANGELES - A man who claims he was wrongly convicted of the 1985 rape and murder of a woman is not entitled to a DNA test because it wouldn't prove his innocence, a Los Angeles judge ruled.
"With all due respect, so what?" Superior Court Judge Alexander Williams III said to Henry Hall's lawyers at a hearing Monday. "I don't mean to be rude, but what do...
"With all due respect, so what?" Superior Court Judge Alexander Williams III said to Henry Hall's lawyers at a hearing Monday. "I don't mean to be rude, but what do...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In